<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I don&#8217;t surf naked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wanderingstan.com/2006-08-16/i_dont_surf_naked/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wanderingstan.com/2006-08-16/i_dont_surf_naked</link>
	<description>wanderings and wonderings of stan james</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seth goldstein</title>
		<link>http://wanderingstan.com/2006-08-16/i_dont_surf_naked/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>seth goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10</guid>
		<description>ok stan.  i am on your blog, looking at fred's searches, seeing that myself and jasonz and dgcohen and walking geek are the most recent visitors to your blog.  as with flickr's background authentication service, i am not sure what i am looking at that i have unique access control to, and what i am looking at that anybody else can see.  clearly, fred is syndicating all searches to all that can see.  but he could authorize this to only those that completed a certain task, such as accepting cookies from him or subcribing directly to his feedburner feed.  to simply distinguish between privacy and publicity does not do your own work justice, in so far as informers live in the gray zone.  or maybe this is just your setup for your own launch into the attention economy.  hmm.... ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok stan.  i am on your blog, looking at fred&#8217;s searches, seeing that myself and jasonz and dgcohen and walking geek are the most recent visitors to your blog.  as with flickr&#8217;s background authentication service, i am not sure what i am looking at that i have unique access control to, and what i am looking at that anybody else can see.  clearly, fred is syndicating all searches to all that can see.  but he could authorize this to only those that completed a certain task, such as accepting cookies from him or subcribing directly to his feedburner feed.  to simply distinguish between privacy and publicity does not do your own work justice, in so far as informers live in the gray zone.  or maybe this is just your setup for your own launch into the attention economy.  hmm&#8230;. ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://wanderingstan.com/2006-08-16/i_dont_surf_naked/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16</guid>
		<description>yes, all good points.

i think the main focus of my post got obscured: that people want to have control over their exposure exposure, and most people aren't ready to reveal all. but my igorance shows: i didn't realize how fine-grained controls the worms have.  got to get to konw them better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, all good points.</p>
<p>i think the main focus of my post got obscured: that people want to have control over their exposure exposure, and most people aren&#8217;t ready to reveal all. but my igorance shows: i didn&#8217;t realize how fine-grained controls the worms have.  got to get to konw them better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
