<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Data &#8211; First Night</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wanderingstan.com/2007-03-12/open_data_first_night/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wanderingstan.com/2007-03-12/open_data_first_night</link>
	<description>wanderings and wonderings of stan james</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 08:02:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greggles</title>
		<link>http://wanderingstan.com/2007-03-12/open_data_first_night/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>greggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Well, in response to &lt;cite&gt;Do we (the consumers, the data publishers) need something like the GPL where we licence our data and how it can be used? Often our &quot;open data&quot; is crawled, processed, and then sold for a lot of money.&lt;/cite&gt;

In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twit.tv/twil3&quot;&gt;http://www.twit.tv/twil3&lt;/a&gt; this week in law episode 3 they talk a lot about consent and implied consent to do &quot;stuff&quot; with &quot;stuff&quot; and the need for machine readable licenses attached to that data.  I&#039;d say the same would be really important for user data.

The best place to implement it in my mind would be in a browser extension (since that&#039;s where most of our online activity happens).  Know any browser extension authors who could add that feature?

How about a set of licenses like the &quot;cc-*&quot; licenses such as pp-anon-ns  (privateproperty-anonymize data-nosharing) and similar.  What other facets would we want/need to track?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in response to <cite>Do we (the consumers, the data publishers) need something like the GPL where we licence our data and how it can be used? Often our &#8220;open data&#8221; is crawled, processed, and then sold for a lot of money.</cite></p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.twit.tv/twil3">http://www.twit.tv/twil3</a> this week in law episode 3 they talk a lot about consent and implied consent to do &#8220;stuff&#8221; with &#8220;stuff&#8221; and the need for machine readable licenses attached to that data.  I&#8217;d say the same would be really important for user data.</p>
<p>The best place to implement it in my mind would be in a browser extension (since that&#8217;s where most of our online activity happens).  Know any browser extension authors who could add that feature?</p>
<p>How about a set of licenses like the &#8220;cc-*&#8221; licenses such as pp-anon-ns  (privateproperty-anonymize data-nosharing) and similar.  What other facets would we want/need to track?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

