This is a listing of recent text selections on this website, excluding this page. Each user session is assigned a random color, which is shown along the left. It's explained more in this post
| | 2008-11-19 19:57:15 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
sent a mail while I\'m in the |
| | 2008-11-19 19:57:07 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
other free |
| | 2008-11-19 19:57:04 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Composing E |
| | 2008-11-19 19:57:00 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
packages have figured out how to do this. But apparently this exotic technology is beyond the grasp of Outlook developers |
| | 2008-11-19 19:07:20 - http://www.wanderingstan.com/2007-12-05/geekout_how_to_make_short_urls
399398203 |
| | 2008-11-19 16:23:12 - http://wanderingstan.com/about
n on Sun, |
| | 2008-11-19 15:57:59 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
free software packages have figured out how to do this. But apparently this exotic technology is beyond the grasp of Outlook developers. (Sure you can use MS Word as your editor to get this effect, but I for one am not going to buy |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:47 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
p |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:25 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
has a large |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:23 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
l |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:21 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
pane painfully slow, leading to confusion about what message you\'re reading.
When you click |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:20 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
2007 they |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:18 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
utloo |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:16 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
send after having been unknowingly logged out, your message is not saved. E.g. you start a mail, are then interrupted for |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:12 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
-size a message |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:10 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
on |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:09 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
to compose |
| | 2008-11-19 14:46:02 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
by about |
| | 2008-11-19 14:45:58 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
trying to copy text from the browser as a quotation in an email. (Without your email looking like shit.)
Further, it is impossible |
| | 2008-11-19 14:45:55 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
email |
| | 2008-11-19 14:45:50 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
you hit |
| | 2008-11-19 14:45:49 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
ognize |
| | 2008-11-19 14:30:34 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
You left out my pet peeve.
I have two MS exchange email accounts. I can only set up one per computer. Outlook only allows one. I can tolerate this on my BlackBerry but on my desktop?
I must switch computers or use the sub-optimal web browser version of MS exchange to access the second account, depending which computer I\'m on. |
| | 2008-11-19 14:30:32 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
You left out my pet peeve.
I have two MS exchange email accounts. I can only set up one per computer. Outlook only allows one. I can tolerate this on my BlackBerry but on my desktop?
I must switch computers or use the sub-optimal web browser version of MS exchange to access the second account, depending which computer I\'m on. |
| | 2008-11-19 14:30:29 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
pet peeve.
I have two MS exchange email accounts. I can only set up one per computer. Outlook only allows one. I can tolerate this on my BlackBerry but on my desktop?
I must switch computers or use the sub-optimal web browser version of MS exchange to access the second account, depending which computer I\'m on. |
| | 2008-11-19 14:30:26 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
ent forests? (for non tech-savvy readers, understand the forest as being all of the different servers that your company uses - like an office with multiple locations) If they are just 2 exchange mailboxes in the same forest, you can use the advanced tab under the account to open additional mailboxes.
Hope this helped.
-WR |
| | 2008-11-19 14:30:15 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
em to the comments. CAMStudio is free software for recording your own screencasts, which you can then upload to YouTube and then leave a link in your comment. |
| | 2008-11-19 14:29:44 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
#
* og box to do paste text without the original formatting. Horribly frustrating when you\'re trying to copy text from the browser as a quotation in an email. (Without your email looking like shit.)
* Further, it is impossible to add keyboard shortcut for pasting unformatted text. (See below) And just to make damn sure it remains impossible, there is no command for this in built in macro language, so even a determined nerd like myself can\'t create a keyboard macro.
* In Outlook 2003 there is no way to paste unformatted text. Pasting in a line from anywhere else (like the browser) will leave you with that line looking different than the rest (and you looking like an idiot). Even worse, after pasting there is no way remove all the formatting on a text so that it matches a normal message composition. Only solution is to first paste into notepad, then copy-n-paste again into message.
# 12. Impossible to remove formatting from a reply
* If you are composing a reply to an email and want to remove formatting (bold, italic, etc..) the ctrl-space command doesn\'t work. It should reset you to the normal format (blue Calibri font), but instead it gives you a totally different format (black Times New Roman). This is especially bad since it is so damn hard to paste text without formatting. (See above) |
| | 2008-11-19 14:28:26 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
y other email program on the planet.)
* Underlining misspelled words is a worldwide software standard. Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice, and a host of other free software packages have figured out how to do this. But apparently this exotic technology is beyond the grasp of Outlook developers. (Sure you can use MS W |
| | 2008-11-19 14:28:25 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
egan using it a year ago, so I started keeping a list. Here is that list.
Sections: Composing Email - Reading Email - Search - Slowness - Usability - Misc - Aesthetics
Composing Email
* 1. No real-time spellcheck (like every other email program on the planet.)
o Underlining misspelled words is a worldwide software standard. Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice, and a host of other free software packages have figured out how to do this. But apparently thi |
| | 2008-11-19 12:45:56 - http://wanderingstan.com/2006-12-17/the_cocktail_party_effect
You\'re at a crowded holiday cocktail party and engaged in conversation about politics. Oh, first a little backstory: For the last week you\'ve been thinking of buying the new Blackberry phone. Back at the party, you suddenly realize that the people behind you are talking about Blackberries. Involuntarily, your attention shifts to that conversation.
What does this have to do with the web? It\'s the problem of information overload again. Before your attention shifted, you were able to concentrate on your conversation even though your ears were recieving input from all the other conversations. This magic is known as the cocktail party effect. Most scientists focus their research on how this is possible, but I\'m more fascinated by the shifts in attention that comes when something \"interesting\" is said in a non-attended conversation. This is a great example of your brain manages limited attention resources. |
| | 2008-11-19 12:45:45 - http://wanderingstan.com/2006-12-17/the_cocktail_party_effect
Back at the party, you suddenly realize that the people behind you are talking about Blackberries. Involuntarily, your attention shifts to that conversation.
|
| | 2008-11-19 12:45:45 - http://wanderingstan.com/2006-12-17/the_cocktail_party_effect
Y |
| | 2008-11-19 10:07:56 - http://wanderingstan.com/2006-11-17/studivz_german_facebook_clone_may_be_acquired_by_facebook
Studivz |
| | 2008-11-19 08:57:55 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
especially bad since it is so damn hard to paste text without formatting. |
| | 2008-11-19 08:57:47 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
but instead it gives you a totally different format |
| | 2008-11-19 07:56:03 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
It\'s always copying formatting I don\'t want.
* It takes four clicks and a dialog box to do paste text without the original formatting. Horribly frustrating when you\'re trying to copy text from the browser as a quotation in an email. (Without your email looking like shit.)
* Further, it is impossible to add keyboard shortcut for pasting unformatted text. (See below) And just to make damn sure it remains impossible, there is no command for this in built in macro language, so even a determined nerd like myself can\'t create a keyboard macro.
* In Outlook 2003 there is no way to paste unformatted text. Pasting in a line from anywhere else (like the browser) will leave you with that line looking different than the rest (and you looking like an idiot). Even worse, after pasting there is no way remove all the formatting on a text so that it matches a normal message composition. Only solution is to first paste into notepad, then copy-n-paste again into message. |
| | 2008-11-19 07:55:32 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
7. Mysterious selection of address for recipient (Outlook 2003)
* Once a name is recognized (God knows when that magically happens), and the person has multiple addresses, you don\'t know which one it picked. (Because it never shows email addresses) You have to double-click the name to find out what it picked. |
| | 2008-11-19 07:49:48 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
56. Almost impossible to get at an actual email address. (Outlook 2007)
* E.g. I\'m trying to email a list of addresses for an invite. As a shortcut, I type \"paul\" in the send field, wait for it do be auto-corrected to his Contact entry, then try to copy and paste the address out. But impossible to copy and paste it into message, it only copies his name part. |
| | 2008-11-19 07:49:12 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
un-searchable |
| | 2008-11-19 07:47:08 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Who wants Archiving?
* Outlook wants to \"Archive\" my old messages, making them un-searchable and out of my normal flow. I just bought a 1 Terabyte disk for $200 and Outlook wants to erase or specially compress my email? What century are they in? Are disks so expensive in Redmond that MS Employees need to pay careful attention to how much space their email takes? Last I checked, GMail and even Hotmail give 5 gigabytes for free. Making old messages un-searchable is unforgivable. |
| | 2008-11-19 07:45:51 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
51. Who wants Archiving?
* Outlook wants to \"Archive\" my old messages, making them un-searchable and out of my normal flow. I just bought a 1 Terabyte disk for $200 and Outlook wants to erase or specially compress my email? What century are they in? Are disks so expensive in Redmond that MS Employees need to pay careful attention to how much space their email takes? Last I checked, GMail and even Hotmail give 5 gigabytes for free. Making old messages un-searchable is unforgivable |
| | 2008-11-19 07:38:18 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
No real-time spellcheck (like every other email program on the planet.)
* Underlining misspelled words is a worldwide software standard. Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice, and a host of other free software packages have figured out how to do this. But apparently this exotic technology is beyond the grasp of Outlook developers. (Sure you can use MS Word as your editor to get this effect, but I for one am not going to buy a 100MB $500 program just to get a feature that is now a commodity.) |
| | 2008-11-19 04:30:56 - http://www.wanderingstan.com/2007-12-05/geekout_how_to_make_short_urls
function convertNumberToURLchars(N, padding) { // Standard unique chars valid in a URL path var chars = \"0123456789\" + \"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz\" + \"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ\" + \"$-_+*,|\\^~`<#%/?@&\"; // These chars will not be recognized as part // of URL by certain email clients (Outlook) // if they are the last char in the URL. chars += \"=:{}()[]\'>,.!\" + \'\"\'; var radix = chars.length; var URLchars=\"\" var Q = Math.floor(Math.abs(N)); var R; // Construct the unique character string while (true) { R = Q % radix; newDigit = chars.charAt(R) URLchars= newDigit + URLchars; Q = (Q-R)/radix; if (Q==0) break; } // Handle padding for (var i=padding-URLchars.length; i>0; i--) { URLchars = chars[0] += URLchars; } return (URLchars); } |
| | 2008-11-19 04:26:52 - http://www.wanderingstan.com/2007-12-05/geekout_how_to_make_short_urls
5vOOv |
| | 2008-11-19 04:20:49 - http://www.wanderingstan.com/2007-12-05/geekout_how_to_make_short_urls
function convertURLcharsToNumber(URLstring) { // Standard unique chars valid in a URL path var chars = \"0123456789\" + \"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz\" + \"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ\" + \"$-_+*,|\\^~`<#%/?@&\"; // These chars will not be recognized as part // of URL by certain email clients (Outlook) // if they are the last char in the URL. chars += \"=:{}()[]\'>,.!\" + \'\"\'; var radix = chars.length; var number = 0; var slot = 0; while (URLstring.length > 0) { char = URLstring.slice(-1); number = number + (chars.indexOf(char) * Math.pow(radix,slot)) ; slot++; URLstring = URLstring.slice(0,-1); } return(number); } |
| | 2008-11-19 02:26:42 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
doesn\'t on any of the 60 odd desktops I\'ve got with blackberrie |
| | 2008-11-18 20:06:17 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
vention. |
| | 2008-11-18 20:06:16 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
es? Twitter could allow businesses to create their own accounts (as Facebook now does), but that wouldn\'t cover things like parks a |
| | 2008-11-18 20:06:15 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
e folks at Twitter HQ are talking about the this geo-hash convention.
But what is it good for? Imagine if each location had it\'s own page. So in my tweet above, you could click through to a #trilogy page for the Trilogy Wine Bar in Boulder. You could see other people who have talked about it and get a sense for the sort of people who go there.
Who creates content for these pages? Twitter could allow businesses to create their own accounts (as Facebook now does), but that wouldn\'t cover things like parks a |
| | 2008-11-18 20:06:06 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
sed URL\'s to indicate a location on a page. Of course, we twittered our new idea:
|
| | 2008-11-18 20:06:04 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
oks like grid lines |
| | 2008-11-18 20:06:01 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
symbol because (a) @ is already t |
| | 2008-11-18 20:05:58 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
idea of using hash marks to indicate locations. We settled on the # symbol because (a) @ is already taken ( |
| | 2008-11-18 20:05:54 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
nd it has now spread beyond twitter. Usernames are prefixed with a @ symbol to indicate that you\'re talking about a person, and the system can turn that nam |
| | 2008-11-18 20:05:52 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
n almost as soon as the service started, and it has now spread beyond twitter. Usernames are prefixed with a @ symbol to indicate that you\'re talking about a person, and the system can turn that na |
| | 2008-11-18 20:05:48 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
users created the \'@username\' convention on their ow |
| | 2008-11-18 20:05:45 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
mes were always circled--an early example of semantic tagging.
Twitter users created the \'@username\' convention on their own a |
| | 2008-11-18 20:05:43 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-01-26/location_in_twitter_and_human_markup
se one for locations? An |
| | 2008-11-18 17:56:16 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Outlook 2003 there is no way to paste unformatted text. Pasting in a line from anywhere else (like the browser) will leave you with that line looking different than the rest (and you looking like an idiot). Even worse, after pasting there is no way remove all the formatting on a text so that it matches a normal message composition. Only solution is to first paste into notepad, then copy-n-paste again into message.
12. Impossible to remove formatting |
| | 2008-11-18 14:06:02 - http://www.wanderingstan.com/2007-12-05/geekout_how_to_make_short_urls
399398203 |
| | 2008-11-18 11:59:06 - http://www.wanderingstan.com/2007-12-05/geekout_how_to_make_short_urls
ww.stopurl.com |
| | 2008-11-18 11:11:05 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
lined pictures at actual size |
| | 2008-11-18 11:10:55 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Outlook will flag mail as spam even if I\'ve e |
| | 2008-11-18 09:15:30 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
t |
| | 2008-11-18 09:15:23 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
ok 2007 they switched the rendering engine to Microsoft Word from Internet Explorer, making formatted emails even uglier and less functional. That\'s right, they ditched their own web browser, the de-facto internet HTML standard, for a word proce |
| | 2008-11-18 07:59:26 - http://www.wanderingstan.com/about
www.lijit.com |
| | 2008-11-18 07:45:50 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
mess |
| | 2008-11-18 07:45:28 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
itch |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:27 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
can |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:26 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Are the different exchange mailboxes hosted in different forests? (for non tech-savvy readers, understand the forest as being all of the different servers that your company uses - like an office with multiple locations) If they% |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:25 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
mailboxes |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:25 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Which could make this issue number 68 on the list. |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:25 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
number |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:24 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
lost |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:24 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Why do you do this? There is no problem connecting outlook to two accounts - I do this all the time for my clients. Two, three or even four accounts. |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:23 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
connecting |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:23 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
3) Its because you\'ve saved it but not sent it - why do you bother, outlook automatically checkpoints the messages so they can be recovered |
| | 2008-11-18 02:27:23 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
outlook |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:40 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
playing |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:39 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Around 30% of the above are reasonable complaints. Around 30% are \'I want outlook to work like xxx\' - it doesn\'t, use the program you prefer. The rest of the problems you are seeing are almost certainly due |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:39 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
are |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:37 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Even 30% reasonable complaints make it more than 20 issues. And that\'s only a single user list, right? |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:37 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
issues |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:37 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Thank you, Wandering Stan! I was using my Outlook at work, and I kept saying, \"Why do I have Deleted Items as the most prominent folder in my \'All Mail Folders\' section?\" Why is the Inbox shown twice |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:36 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
products |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:36 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
shown |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:35 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Thank you, Wandering Stan! I was using my Outlook at work, and I kept saying, \"Why do I have Deleted Items as the most prominent folder in my \'All Mail Folders\' section?\" Why is the Inbox shown twice |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:35 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
shown |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:34 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
not |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:34 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
sends |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:34 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
The solution seems to be to make sure Outlook never sends out messages in RTF format. (always use HTML instead) |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:33 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
sends |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:32 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
. |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:32 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
recommend |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:32 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
both |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:31 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
clicked |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:30 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
takes |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:30 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
items |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:30 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
which |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:29 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
which |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:29 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Check this out, once you set up archive rules, you can\'t change the name of the Archive Folder: on the next Auto Archive, the name is changed back mysteriously. |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:28 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
name |
| | 2008-11-18 02:26:28 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Check this out, once you set up archive rules, you can\'t change the name of the Archive Folder: on the next Auto Archive, the name is changed back mysteriously. |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:34 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
What is RESTAURANT? (something tells me it\'s a dumb question:D) |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:30 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
: |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:28 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
that |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:27 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
encourage |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:26 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
energy |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:26 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
jeneratör |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:25 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
comments |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:25 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
override |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:24 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
You may only export one folder at a time to a PST file, so you can\'t export your inbox folder and sent folders at the same time. (You might think to put them both in one folder and export that one, but |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:23 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Outlook |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:22 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Outlook |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:22 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
After you close all open Outlook windows you would think that it would stop running. (And stop taking up memory and processor cycleas.) But no, Outlook will continue to run even after you\'ve quit. Only way is to open |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:21 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
way |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:21 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
After you close all open Outlook windows you would think that it would stop running. (And stop taking up memory and processor cycleas.) But no, Outlook will continue to run even after you\'ve quit. Only way is to open |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:20 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
running |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:19 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
E.g. I\'m trying to email a list of addresses for an invite. As a shortcut, I type \"paul\" in the send field, wait for it do be auto-corrected to his Contact entry, then try to copy and paste the addr |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:19 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
field |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:18 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
If you have categories from an old version of outlook, and you click on that category in Outlook 2007, the category is deleted without warning. See it in destructive action in the screencast below. |
| | 2008-11-18 02:22:17 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
2007 |
| | 2008-11-18 02:19:12 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
screenshot |
| | 2008-11-18 02:19:07 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
If you leave it open for a workday, it will really start to grind your system to a halt. (Note that in this screenshot, Gmail was loaded in one of the many tabs in Firefox!) |
| | 2008-11-18 02:19:06 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
screenshot |
| | 2008-11-18 02:19:01 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
really |
| | 2008-11-18 02:19:00 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
emails |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:56 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
images |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:55 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
asking |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:54 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Outlook wants to \"Archive\" my old messages, making them un-searchable and out of my normal flow. I just bought a 1 Terabyte disk for $200 and Outlook wants to erase or specially compress my email? What century are |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:53 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Employees |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:53 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Outlook wants to \"Archive\" my old messages, making them un-searchable and out of my normal flow. I just bought a 1 Terabyte disk for $200 and Outlook wants to erase or specially compress my email? What century are |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:52 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Employees |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:51 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Outlook wants to \"Archive\" my old messages, making them un-searchable and out of my normal flow. I just bought a 1 Terabyte disk for $200 and Outlook wants to erase or specially compress my email? What century are |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:49 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
old |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:49 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Can anyone make sense of these? |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:48 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
make |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:48 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Can anyone make sense of these? |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:46 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
make |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:45 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
E.g. I\'m reading an old mail, then read a related mail, then search for a super old related mail, and then try to get back to the original one I was reading. No way to locate it except by searching, t |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:44 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
reading |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:44 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
44. When you enter a task in the To-Do pane and hit enter, the text you enters just disappears. |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:44 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
, |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:43 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
43. An open dialog box disables every other function in Outlook. |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:42 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
Outlook |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:41 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
and |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:41 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
exchange |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:40 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
sucking |
| | 2008-11-18 02:18:40 - http://wanderingstan.com/2008-02-01/67_reasons_that_outlook_sucks
email |